Skip to content
MDThesis

§ IThe reading room

MD · MS · DNB · DrNB · DM · MCh · MDS thesis mentorship

Your thesis, guided by senior doctors. Tracked live. Annotated in place. Checked word by word.


A panel of practising postgraduate teachers in your own specialty stays with you from topic to submission, not a single introductory call. You watch every stage move in your dashboard, pin comments on the exact spot in the draft, and submit with a word-level uniqueness report in hand.[1]

  • A senior doctor, all the way throughA practising postgraduate teacher in your own specialty signs off the topic, the methodology and every chapter — not one introductory call.
  • Every stage dated and visibleFifteen stages in your own tracker, each with an owner and a date, so you always know what is happening and who is holding it.
  • Checked word by word before submissionMDSoftune, our uniqueness engine built with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada, reads every draft at word and phrase level rather than in blocks.

Free feasibility review within one working day · no payment to start

Read the ethics charter →

Standards we work to

  • NMC PGMER-2023
  • NBEMS 180 days / 26 months
  • UGC 2018 · under 10%
  • ICMR 2017 · ethics

We work to these published standards and are affiliated to none of them · mentoring, editing, statistics and compliance · you remain the sole author

Try the review room: pin a note on a specimen draft page

An interactive demonstration of the MDThesis review room. The page is an illustrative sample we wrote ourselves, not a student’s thesis. Notes you add stay in this browser tab, are never saved or sent, and any reply you see is scripted by this demonstration rather than written by a doctor.

The reading room · specimen draft v3 · page 10 of 94

View only

Illustrative sample · our own writing, not a student’s thesis · a demonstration of the interface, nothing is saved or sent

5 of 5 notes left

2. Review of literature

Intrathecal adjuvants have been investigated for four decades with the shared aim of prolonging sensory blockade without extending motor recovery or compromising haemodynamic stability. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists occupy a particular place in this literature because their analgesic action is mediated at the dorsal horn rather than by sodium channel blockade, which allows a qualitatively different contribution to the block.

Clonidine, the earlier and less selective of the two agents examined here, has an alpha-2 to alpha-1 selectivity ratio of approximately 200:1. Its intrathecal use has been reported to prolong both sensory and motor blockade in a dose-dependent fashion, with the most consistent benefit described between 30 and 75 micrograms. Above that range the reported incidence of hypotension and sedation rises steeply, which has limited its adoption in day-care settings.

Page 10 of 94 · Review of literature · illustrative sample

  • Edit
  • Add
  • Remove
  • Question

Download locked until final settlement · every draft watermarked with your name and email


The panel

Your team

A senior doctor in your specialty, for the whole thesis


A practising postgraduate teacher in your own field stays with the work from topic feasibility to viva, alongside a professional medical writer and a biostatistician. Not one introductory call.

The panel

The panel register is being published. Until every entry is verified, we publish none.

Mentors are matched to your specialty rather than picked from a page. On the feasibility call we tell you which senior doctor in your field would take your thesis, their degree and their department, and you decide before you pay anything.

No name is listed here until its credentials are verified


The instruments

What you get

Everything on the record, nothing over WhatsApp


A dated tracker, drafts you annotate in place, protected previews, and a word-level uniqueness report on every version.

  • Fig. 01The record

    Fifteen stages, every one dated

    Your project sits on one register from enquiry to delivery. You can see the stage it is on, what that stage produces, who owns it, and how much of the statutory runway is left.

    Specimen record · MDT-26-0142 · illustrative sample, not a student's project

  • Fig. 02The panel

    A senior doctor panel, always there

    A practising postgraduate teacher from your specialty stays with the project throughout — feasibility, methodology sign-off, chapter review, viva preparation. They do not write the thesis for you.

    The mentor panel is published entry by entry. We list no mentor until the credentials are verified.

  • Fig. 03The pin

    Pin a comment anywhere in the PDF

    Open a draft, click the exact spot on page 10 and say edit, add, remove or ask a question. Your doctor answers in the same thread, and the note closes against a version rather than drifting down a chat.

    Illustrative sample · our own authored text, not a student's thesis

  • Fig. 04The seal

    Protected, watermarked drafts

    Drafts are read in a view-only viewer, watermarked with the name and email of whoever opened them. Nothing travels by email attachment. The download unlocks when the balance is settled.

    View only until final settlement · watermarked with your name and email

  • Fig. 05The sweep

    MDSoftune reads it word by word

    Our engine, built with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada, checks every draft at word and phrase level rather than in blocks. Standard clinical phrasing is left alone; a distinctive sequence is flagged and the writer rephrases it.

    Illustration of method · not a score for your document

  • Fig. 06The schedule

    Fees published in your currency

    Every fee is on the page, in the currency you would pay in, converted at the published rate. Nothing is held back for a private quotation over WhatsApp.

    The full schedule is published on the fees page

  • Fig. 07The calendar

    NMC and NBEMS dates tracked

    NBEMS gives a DNB or DrNB candidate 180 days to the protocol and 26 months to the thesis. NMC PGMER-2023 routes run to the university's own ordinance. We work the plan backwards from whichever applies to you.

    Derived from published rules · confirm against your own university calendar

§ IVSIX STEPS

THE PROCESS OF RECORD

Six steps, and you can watch every one of them happen.


  1. PLATE 01 · THE RECORD OPENS01 / 06
    ILLUSTRATION OF OUR OWN METHOD · NOT A STUDENT’S DOCUMENT

    Step 1 of 6. Register and share your requirement

    Your course, specialty, university, submission deadline and where you stand today. A senior doctor reads it and replies within one working day with a feasibility opinion. Your record opens at the same time, with a reference on it.

    YOU · THEN A DOCTOR ON THE PANEL

    STAGE 01 OF 15 · Enquiry

  2. PLATE 02 · YOUR TEAM OF RECORD02 / 06
    ILLUSTRATION OF OUR OWN METHOD · NOT A STUDENT’S DOCUMENT

    Step 2 of 6. Meet your team

    A senior doctor who teaches in your own specialty, a professional medical writer, and a biostatistician when your design needs one. They are named in your dashboard on assignment, and they stay with the thesis until submission.

    PANEL MENTOR · MEDICAL WRITER · BIOSTATISTICIAN

    STAGE 02 OF 15 · Onboarding

  3. PLATE 03 · SYNOPSIS v103 / 06
    ILLUSTRATION OF OUR OWN METHOD · NOT A STUDENT’S DOCUMENT

    Step 3 of 6. Topic and synopsis

    Three topic options, weighed against what your hospital can actually give you — case volume, records access, the months you have left. Then the synopsis in your university’s own format, with the sample size calculated and the methodology written to be defended.

    MENTOR PROPOSES · YOU AND YOUR GUIDE DECIDE

    STAGES 03–04 OF 15 · Topic selection → Synopsis / protocol

  4. PLATE 04 · IEC PACK · ANALYSIS OUTPUT04 / 06
    ILLUSTRATION OF OUR OWN METHOD · NOT A STUDENT’S DOCUMENT

    Step 4 of 6. Ethics, data and analysis

    The ethics committee pack — protocol, patient information sheet, consent form and case record proforma — prepared for your own submission. You collect the data. The biostatistician analyses it in SPSS or R and writes the tables up so that you can explain every one of them.

    YOU COLLECT · THE BIOSTATISTICIAN ANALYSES

    STAGES 05–07 OF 15 · Ethics committee → Statistical analysis

  5. PLATE 05 · DRAFT v3 · PINNED NOTES05 / 06
    ILLUSTRATION OF OUR OWN METHOD · NOT A STUDENT’S DOCUMENT

    Step 5 of 6. Writing and review online

    Chapters arrive as drafts in a watermarked, view-only viewer. Click the exact spot you want changed, mark it Edit, Add, Remove or Question, and write the note. Your team replies in the thread and resolves it in the next version, so nothing is lost in a chat.

    WRITER DRAFTS · MENTOR REVIEWS · YOU DECIDE

    STAGES 08–11 OF 15 · Chapter writing → Revisions

  6. PLATE 06 · UNIQUENESS REPORT · DELIVERY06 / 06
    ILLUSTRATION OF OUR OWN METHOD · NOT A STUDENT’S DOCUMENT

    Step 6 of 6. Uniqueness check and delivery

    MDSoftune reads every draft word by word and phrase by phrase rather than comparing coarse blocks, and a report ships with each version — the UGC 2018 convention is under 10% similarity. Final formatting follows your university’s ordinance, and the download unlocks once the account is settled.

    MDSOFTUNE · THEN FINAL FORMATTING

    STAGES 12–14 OF 15 · Final formatting → Delivered


MENTORING, EDITING, STATISTICS AND COMPLIANCE · YOU REMAIN THE SOLE AUTHOR

§ VI — MDSOFTUNE

Proprietary instrument

An examiner reads word by word. So do we.


MDSoftune is our own engine, developed with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada. It reads a draft the way an examiner does: word by word, and phrase by phrase. Block-level tools compare paragraphs, so they miss a borrowed fragment sitting inside a sentence you wrote yourself, and they over-flag the routine clinical language that every thesis has to reuse.

A report ships with every draft, so you see what was flagged and why long before your university runs Turnitin or Drillbit. We work to the UGC 2018 convention of under 10% similarity.

WORD + PHRASE LEVEL

Not paragraph blocks.

EVERY DRAFT, EVERY VERSION

Re-run on each revision.

MEDICAL PHRASING AWARE

Standard clinical language is not treated as theft.

INCLUDED IN EVERY FEE

Never a paid extra.

What the engine actually does

  1. 01

    Ingest

    The draft is taken apart: sentences, phrases and single words, with tables, references and headings separated so they are judged by the right rule.

  2. 02

    Scan

    Every word and every phrase is compared, not paragraph blocks. A borrowed fragment sitting inside a sentence you wrote yourself is still found.

  3. 03

    Classify

    Routine clinical and statistical phrasing is marked as allowed. A sequence that sits too close to a published sentence is marked for rewriting, in your own voice, with the citation kept.

  4. 04

    Report

    A report ships with the draft: what was flagged, why, and what changed. Nothing is a surprise when your university runs Turnitin or Drillbit.

THE BOUNDARY

MDSoftune is used to prove that original work is original. It is never used to disguise copied content, to paraphrase around a source, or to defeat an academic-integrity check. A flagged passage is rewritten in your own voice with the citation kept in place, or it is cited properly and left alone. You remain the sole author.

MDSOFTUNE · UNIQUENESS REPORT

COMPLETE

SPECIMEN · OUR OWN ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE · MDT-26-0142

¶ 2.2 · REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Intrathecal clonidine has been reported to prolong both sensory and motor blockade in a dose-dependent fashion, with the most consistent benefit described between 30 and 75 micrograms.

¶ 3.1 · AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Primary objective: to compare the duration of sensory blockade, defined as the time from intrathecal injection to two-segment regression of the sensory level.

¶ 4.3 · SAMPLE SIZE

Sample size was calculated to detect a 20-minute difference in two-segment regression time, assuming a standard deviation of 30 minutes, with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05.

¶ 4.6 · STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Continuous variables were compared using an unpaired t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test according to the distribution of the data.

  1. [1]

    in a dose-dependent fashion

    standard clinical phrasing — allowed
  2. [2]

    the time from intrathecal injection to two-segment regression

    defined term — keep the wording, cite the source
  3. [3]

    with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05

    standard statistical phrasing — allowed
  4. [4]

    compared using an unpaired t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test

    close to a published sentence — rewrite

ILLUSTRATIVE SIMILARITY

1.8 per cent in this illustration

TARGET UNDER 10% · UGC 2018 CONVENTION

WORDS CHECKED
98
PHRASES FLAGGED
4
TO REWRITE
1

ILLUSTRATION OF METHOD · OUR OWN SAMPLE TEXT · NOT A SCORE FOR ANY THESIS

BLOCK LEVEL · WHAT ORDINARY TOOLS SEE

One verdict per block. A borrowed fragment inside a paragraph you wrote yourself can pass, and routine clinical language can be condemned with it.

WORD AND PHRASE LEVEL · WHAT MDSOFTUNE SEES

One bar, one word, drawn at the real word lengths of the sentence above. The bracket is a phrase: the unit a block-level tool never looks at.


Schedule of fees

Published fees

Fees in the open, in your currency

Read from our own service register


No quote by WhatsApp. Each service carries a published fee, a stated scope and a typical duration, payable in milestone instalments.

  • Service

    Topic & Synopsis

    Three vetted topics, then a full synopsis in your university format

    FeeINR

    ₹14,999was₹19,999

    or 3 milestone instalments, the first ₹6,000 indicative

    Typical duration

    7–10 days

    What is included
    • 3 vetted topic options with feasibility notes
    • Literature gap analysis
    • Full synopsis in your university format
    • Sample-size calculation with justification

    2 further inclusions on the service record.

  • Service

    Data Analysis & Statistics

    SPSS or R analysis by a biostatistician

    FeeINR

    ₹12,999was₹16,999

    or 3 milestone instalments, the first ₹5,200 indicative

    Typical duration

    5–7 days

    What is included
    • Master chart cleaning & coding
    • Test selection with rationale
    • Tables, graphs and figures
    • Results chapter write-up

    2 further inclusions on the service record.

  • ServiceMost chosen

    Complete Thesis Mentorship

    Synopsis to submission, with your doctor & writer

    FeeINR

    ₹49,999was₹69,999

    or 3 milestone instalments, the first ₹20,000 indicative

    Typical duration

    45–90 days

    What is included
    • Dedicated doctor mentor from your specialty
    • Professional medical writer
    • All chapters: introduction to summary
    • Statistics with SPSS/R output

    4 further inclusions on the service record.

Every fee here is published, not quoted privately. Pay in 2 or 3 milestone instalments: UPI, cards, net-banking and EMI via Razorpay in India; cards worldwide, charged in Indian rupees. Each fee includes the MDSoftune uniqueness report.


The charter

Ethics

What we do, and what we refuse to do


The question every resident actually wants answered, answered first and in writing. Three of the seven articles are below.

The ethics charter

three of seven articles


This charter sets the limits of what MDThesis sells. It is published in full, in one place, because the question a postgraduate most needs answered — is this ghostwriting? — deserves an answer in writing rather than a reassurance on a call. Every article below binds every person who works on your project.

  1. Article 1 · What we provide

    Article 1. We provide mentorship, editing, statistics, formatting and compliance review — and nothing else.

    A senior doctor from your own specialty advises on feasibility, study design and methodology, and reads your chapters. A professional medical writer edits your text for structure, clarity and language. A biostatistician plans the analysis, runs it, and explains the output in terms you can defend in a viva. We format to your university's ordinance, reference in the style it requires, and check every draft for similarity before it reaches you. Each of those is work done alongside yours. None of it is a substitute for doing the work.

  2. Article 2 · Authorship

    Article 2. You are the sole author of your thesis. We will not write it for you, and we are not named in it.

    You choose the topic. You apply for ethics approval in your own name. You collect the data and it remains yours. You read and approve every chapter before it moves to the next stage, and you can ask for the reasoning behind any change we suggest. We claim no authorship, no co-authorship and no acknowledgement. We do not meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship of your thesis, and we do not ask to.

  3. Article 3 · What we refuse

    Article 3. Some requests end an enquiry rather than open a negotiation.

    These refusals are absolute. They hold whatever the fee, whatever the deadline, and whoever is asking.

    • We do not fabricate, alter, pad or supply data, cases, investigations or results. If the data does not exist, the answer is a study that is feasible, not a study that is invented.
    • We do not ghost-author. We will not produce a synopsis, a chapter or a thesis to be handed in as your own unaided work, and we will not claim you wrote something you did not.
    • We do not appear as you. We will not write to or speak with your guide, your department, your ethics committee or your university as though we were the student.
    • We do not guarantee a grade, a pass, approval by any committee, acceptance by any university, or publication in any journal. No one honest can.
    • We do not reuse your work. Your topic, your data and your text are never recycled into another student's project.
    • We do not accept a project we cannot do honestly in the time that is left. We say so at the feasibility stage and decline it.

Mentoring, editing, statistics and compliance. You remain the sole author.

This is an excerpt of the charter. Nothing in the articles not printed here softens what is printed above.


The record

Record of practice

What we can evidence


Structural facts about this platform, read from its own configuration. Anything we cannot evidence is not on this page.

  • Specialties with a matched doctor mentor

    24+


    Broad and super-specialty, from General Medicine to MCh Urology

  • Stages tracked in your live dashboard

    15


    Enquiry through to delivery, each with dates and a countdown

  • Currencies priced at checkout

    17


    Auto-detected from your location, switchable any time

  • Countries and programmes supported

    8


    India, UK, USA, Nepal, Bangladesh, Gulf, Sri Lanka, Caribbean and Africa

  • Similarity target on every draft

    under 10%


    The UGC 2018 convention, checked by MDSoftune before your university ever runs Turnitin

Protection of your work

  • Row-level security

    Every table enforces row-level access. You read your own record, and nothing else.

  • View-only streaming

    Drafts are streamed to you through an authenticated route, not handed over as a file.

  • Watermarked to you

    Every page you read carries your own name and email across it.

  • Download gated

    The final file unlocks when the fee is settled in full, and not before.

  • Mumbai region · DPDP 2023

    Your record and your documents are held in the Mumbai region, so India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 applies to them.

  • Anonymised data only

    We accept no patient identifiers. An NDA is available on request.

How this works

Instruments we work to

  • NMC PGMER-2023

    The thesis obligations set out in the postgraduate medical education regulations.

  • NBEMS

    DNB and DrNB protocol and thesis timelines, and the page limit, as published.

  • UGC 2018 · <10%

    The academic integrity convention we work to on every draft.

  • ICMJE · Vancouver

    Authorship criteria and reference style, applied as published.

  • No affiliation

    We work to these published instruments. We are affiliated to none of the bodies that issue them.

How this works

Authorship and the uniqueness check

  • Sole author

    Mentoring, editing, statistics and compliance. You remain the sole author of your thesis.

  • Not ghostwriting

    We will not write your thesis for you, and we will not be named in it.

  • MDSoftune

    Word-level uniqueness checking, built with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada.

  • Every version

    Each draft is checked word by word before your university sees it.

How this works

MDThesis is an independent academic mentorship practice. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting for the NMC, NBEMS, UGC or any university.


Questions

Questions

Honest answers before you commit


The first is the question everybody asks and nobody in this market answers plainly.

  • No, and yes. MDThesis is a mentorship, editing, statistics and compliance service. You choose the topic, collect the data and approve every chapter. A senior doctor from your specialty and a professional medical writer guide, structure, analyse and edit with you so your thesis is scientifically sound, well-written and submission-ready. You remain the sole author.

Something not covered? Ask a senior mentor.

Free feasibility call

Tell us where your thesis stands. A senior doctor will tell you what to do next.


A senior doctor replies within one working day. No obligation. MD, MS, DNB, DrNB, DM, MCh, MDS and international programmes.

Request for a feasibility call

No obligation


No spam. A senior mentor replies personally. Your details stay private.


Reply within one working day · No obligation · Your details are not shared

Prefer to write to us first? Contact the practice. We mentor and edit; you remain the sole author of your thesis.

Document: Homepage · Revision 3 · Last reviewed

Issued by MDThesis, a brand of REDENN Informatics Private Limited