About the practice
An academic practice, run like a teaching department
A senior doctor from your own specialty owns the science, a scientific editor owns the clarity, and you remain the sole author. Everything between those three people is on the record: published fees, dated stages, drafts marked in place, and a uniqueness report on every version.
The reason
Residents pay for help they cannot see, track or trust
That is a failure of record-keeping as much as of scholarship, and it is the failure this practice was built to correct.
This is the account we hear most often from the residents who write to us. A figure agreed in a chat window. A file that arrives weeks after it was promised. Corrections sent as voice notes. No statement of who did what, and no way to know whether the writing was original until the university checks it for them. Each step is ordinary. What is wrong is that none of them leave a record.
A thesis is not a purchase. It is a supervised piece of original research with statutory dates attached, read by examiners who read for a living. The Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 make it a requirement of the degree itself[1]. NBEMS sets the protocol at 180 days from joining and the thesis at 26 months, inside an 80-page limit[2]. Your university applies the UGC similarity convention of under 10%[3]. Work coordinated over chat cannot be held to any of that, because there is nothing to hold.
So this practice is built around the record rather than around the sale. None of what follows is remarkable. It is what a good department already expects of its own residents, offered to residents whose departments are stretched too thin to give it.
Published fees
Every service has a fee, a stated scope and a typical duration, published in Indian rupees before you speak to anyone. A local-currency figure is an estimate for reference. The schedule is here.
A dated record
15 stages, each with a date and a named owner, visible in your account from the day your record opens. Progress is something you read, not something you ask about.
Drafts marked in place
You review every draft before your next payment, in a viewer watermarked with your own name and email, where your comment attaches to the exact point on the page. The download unlocks on final payment.
Word-level checking
MDSoftune, built with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada, reads every draft word by word and phrase by phrase. The report travels with the draft, an additional review before your institution runs its own check.
How we work
Three responsibilities, kept separate on purpose
The science, the clarity and the work itself belong to different people. That separation is what keeps the thesis yours, and it is the part of the method we will not bend.
Owns the science
The senior doctor
A practising postgraduate teacher from your own specialty. They give the feasibility opinion on your topic, sign off the design and the sample size, read each chapter the way an examiner reads it, and prepare you for your viva. They do not write your thesis.
Owns the clarity
The scientific editor
A scientific editor who edits your drafts for structure, argument and language, sets the tables and figures to the format your university ordinance requires, and makes the referencing consistent. They work on your material, never in place of it.
Own the work
You
You choose the topic, obtain ethics approval, collect your own data, approve every chapter and sign the thesis as its sole author. We claim no authorship and no co-authorship, and we help you disclose our assistance in the form your institution or a journal requires. Authorship of any paper that follows is decided by the ICMJE contribution criteria[4], with your guide and your collaborators.
Where a study needs formal analysis, a biostatistician joins for that stage and states which test was used and why, so that you can defend the result rather than recite it. Your record names who is responsible at each of the 15 stages, and a message in the thread reaches that person. There is no switchboard, and no account manager standing between you and the people doing the work.
Record of practice
What we can evidence, and nothing we cannot
Structural facts about this practice are read from its own configuration. Performance figures appear only when they carry a stated source. Where we have nothing to show, the space stays empty rather than being filled.
Specialties covered: 24 · Stages tracked: 15[6]
Specialties with a matched doctor mentor
24+
Broad and super-specialty, from General Medicine to MCh Urology
Stages tracked in your live dashboard
15
Enquiry through to delivery, each with dates and a countdown
Currencies priced at checkout
17
Auto-detected from your location, switchable any time
Countries and programmes supported
8
India, UK, USA, Nepal, Bangladesh, Gulf, Sri Lanka, Caribbean and Africa
Similarity read against the UGC 2018 convention
under 10%
The UGC 2018 convention, checked by MDSoftune before your university ever runs Turnitin
Protection of your work
Private to you and your assigned team
Your project is accessible only to you and authorised team members. The database enforces that on every read.
Review before you pay
You review every draft before your next payment, streamed to you through an authenticated route.
Watermarked to you
Every page you read carries your own name and email across it.
Download on final payment
The final file unlocks for download when the fee is settled in full.
Mumbai region · DPDP 2023
Your record and your documents are held in the Mumbai region, so India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 applies to them.
Anonymised data only
We accept no patient identifiers. An NDA is available on request.
Instruments we work to
NMC PGMER-2023
The thesis obligations set out in the postgraduate medical education regulations.
NBEMS
DNB and DrNB protocol and thesis timelines, and the page limit, as published.
UGC 2018 · <10%
The academic integrity convention we read every similarity report against.
ICMJE · Vancouver
Authorship and acknowledgement in journal papers, and reference style, as published.
No affiliation
We work to these published instruments. We are affiliated to none of the bodies that issue them.
Authorship and the uniqueness check
Sole author
Mentoring, editing, statistics and compliance. You remain the sole author of your thesis.
Not ghostwriting
We will not write your thesis for you. We claim no authorship or co-authorship, and we help you disclose our help where your institution asks for it.
MDSoftune
Word-level uniqueness checking, built with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada.
Every version
Each draft is checked word by word before your university sees it.
MDThesis is an independent academic mentorship practice. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting for the NMC, NBEMS, UGC or any university.
Ethics
What we refuse to do
This is a service boundary, not fine print. It is also the reason some enquiries end with us saying no.
We are asked to write theses outright more often than we would like. We decline every time, and we say why rather than quoting a policy at the student. A thesis submitted as your own work and written by somebody else is misconduct under your own university regulations, it is the one finding that cannot be put right at the viva, and it defeats the only purpose the exercise has: that you come out of it able to design a study and read a paper properly.
What we do instead is what a supervisor does. Argue with your topic until it is feasible, hold the methods to the standard, mark the drafts honestly, and leave the writing in your hands with the editing done on it. The charter below is published so that you can hold us to it, and so that you know before you pay which requests we turn down.
The ethics charter
seven articles
MDThesis
This charter sets the limits of what MDThesis sells. It is published in full, in one place, because the question a postgraduate most needs answered — is this ghostwriting? — deserves an answer in writing rather than a reassurance on a call. Every article below binds every person who works on your project.
Article 1 · What we provide
Article 1. We provide mentorship, editing, statistics, formatting and compliance review — and nothing else.
A senior doctor from your own specialty advises on feasibility, study design and methodology, and reads your chapters. A scientific editor edits your text for structure, clarity and language. A biostatistician plans the analysis, runs it, and explains the output in terms you can defend in a viva. We format to your university's ordinance, reference in the style it requires, and check every draft for similarity before it reaches you. Each of those is work done alongside yours. None of it is a substitute for doing the work.
Article 2 · Authorship
Article 2. You are the sole author of your thesis. We will not write it for you, and we claim no authorship of it.
You choose the topic. You apply for ethics approval in your own name. You collect the data and it remains yours. You read and approve every chapter before it moves to the next stage, and you can ask for the reasoning behind any change we suggest. We claim no authorship and no co-authorship. We keep a record of the assistance we give, and where your institution or a journal asks for writing, editing or statistical help to be disclosed, we help you disclose it in the form they require. Authorship of any paper that follows is decided by the ICMJE contribution criteria, with your guide and your collaborators.
Article 3 · What we refuse
Article 3. Some requests end an enquiry rather than open a negotiation.
These refusals are absolute. They hold whatever the fee, whatever the deadline, and whoever is asking.
- We do not fabricate, alter, pad or supply data, cases, investigations or results. If the data does not exist, the answer is a study that is feasible, not a study that is invented.
- We do not ghost-author. We will not write a synopsis, a chapter or a thesis for you to hand in, and we will not claim you wrote something you did not.
- We do not appear as you. We will not write to or speak with your guide, your department, your ethics committee or your university as though we were the student.
- We do not guarantee a grade, a pass, approval by any committee, acceptance by any university, or publication in any journal. No one honest can.
- We do not reuse your work. Your topic, your data and your text are never recycled into another student's project.
- We do not accept a project we cannot do honestly in the time that is left. We say so at the feasibility stage and decline it.
Article 4 · Integrity tooling
Article 4. MDSoftune exists to find similarity early, never to hide it.
Our uniqueness engine, built with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada, reads a draft word by word and phrase by phrase, so that standard clinical phrasing is told apart from a passage that genuinely needs a citation or your own rewording. We use it to find similarity early and to help you put a passage into your own words. We do not use it to disguise copied text, to dress a source up until it passes a check, or to defeat your university's own integrity process. Where a passage is not yours, the remedy is a citation or your own rewording, never a tool.
We read every report against the UGC 2018 convention of under 10% similarity. That is a reference standard, not a result we promise.
Article 5 · Data and patients
Article 5. Anonymised data only. Identifiable patient information never reaches us.
Strip the identifiers before you send anything: names, hospital and registration numbers, addresses, telephone numbers, admission dates that could identify an episode, photographs, and any free-text field that names a person. If a file arrives with identifiers in it we stop, tell you, and delete our copy rather than work on it. An NDA is signed on request. Access to your drafts is limited to the people working on your project, and your project files are deleted on completion when you ask us to delete them.
Article 6 · Independence
Article 6. We are independent. We are not affiliated with the NMC, NBEMS or any university.
We work to published standards — NMC PGMER-2023, the NBEMS thesis guidelines, the UGC 2018 convention on academic integrity, the ICMJE recommendations on authorship and acknowledgement in journal papers, and each university's own format ordinance. We are not affiliated with, approved by, accredited by or endorsed by any body that issues them, nor by any university. We hold no influence over any committee, examiner, guide or journal, and we will never imply that we do. Where your institution's rule differs from anything we have written, your institution's rule governs: check it there, and tell us what it says.
No regulator's name, crest or mark appears on this site as an endorsement, because none of them endorses us.
Article 7 · Raising a concern
Article 7. If we fall short of this charter, tell us, and you will get an answer in writing.
Write with your thesis reference and what happened. We acknowledge within one working day and reply in writing with what we found and what we are doing about it. If anyone working on your project ever proposes something this charter refuses, report it: we stop the work, review it, and tell you the outcome. Nothing here replaces your institution's own academic-integrity process, and we will never ask you to keep a concern between us.
Mentoring, editing, statistics and compliance. You remain the sole author.
Where we are going
What we are building next
Stated plainly, so that you can ask us about it. None of it carries a promised date, and nothing below is available today unless this page says it is.
- More university formats on file. A format is added only after we have read that university's own ordinance, and we record the date we verified it. We would rather publish a short verified list than a long unverified one.
- A statutory timetable anyone can use, without an account. Enter your course, your registering body and your session start, and read every statutory date derived from the published rules, each labelled with the instrument it comes from.
- Specimen deliverables you can inspect before paying. An edited synopsis spread, an MDSoftune report page and a format checklist, taken from our own work with all identifying content removed.
- Better handling of standard clinical phrasing in MDSoftune. Continued with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada. Judging a medical thesis fairly means telling a definition every textbook shares apart from a borrowed sentence, and that is the hard part.
When one of these ships it appears on this page, with the date the page was reviewed. The revision line at the foot is there so you can see whether anybody is still maintaining it.
Our commitments
What we undertake in writing
These are undertakings, not slogans. Each one describes something the practice already does, and each names the published document where you can hold us to it.
Schedule of undertakings
Six clauses
Synopsis revisions are supported free until your guide and committee are satisfied
If the synopsis comes back with changes, we guide your revision and edit it for resubmission, for as many rounds as your guide and the departmental committee require, at no further fee.
Every draft carries a similarity report, read against the 10% convention
MDSoftune checks each draft word by word and phrase by phrase before it reaches you, and the report travels with the draft. It is read against the UGC 2018 convention of under 10% similarity; if a final report exceeds 10% on a passage we edited, we fix it free.
Revisions continue until your guide signs off
We review and edit each revision until your guide accepts the chapter. The included rounds are stated in the written scope before you pay, so you always know what is covered.
Applies to: the Thesis serviceSee terms · scope and revisionsMilestones are tracked against your university or NBEMS dates
Your timeline is built from the dates that actually bind you — your university's own ordinance where we have it on file, or the NBEMS 180-day protocol and 26-month thesis dates where they apply. Every milestone, with its date, is visible to you in the tracker.
Confidential by design
We accept anonymised data only and never identifiable patient information. An NDA is signed on request. Drafts are read in a protected viewer, watermarked with your own name and email, and the final download unlocks on full payment.
A doctor stays reachable for the whole project
Your mentor is a practising postgraduate teacher from your specialty, available through the project for feasibility, methodology, chapter review and viva preparation. Not one introductory call at the start.
What we do not undertake
We do not write your thesis, we do not fabricate data, and we do not promise a grade, acceptance or publication. We mentor, edit, analyse and check compliance. You remain the sole author, and we claim no authorship or co-authorship of your thesis.
Read the terms of serviceOrganisation details
Who you are dealing with
The details a sceptical reader should be able to find without asking. Anything not yet verified is absent rather than approximated.
- Brand
- MDThesis is a brand of REDENN Informatics Private Limited, India. It is an academic mentorship practice for medical postgraduates, and it is independent of the NMC, NBEMS, the UGC and every university.
- Clinical partner and mentor
- Dr. Poonam Sekhon Chahal, MBBS, MEM, CCT-EM — Senior Emergency Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Manipal Hospital, Patiala. A partner in the venture, she guides MDThesis researchers. She trained in emergency medicine at Dr. L. H. Hiranandani Hospital, Mumbai, and carried out her own retrospective thesis there, through ethics and scientific committee approval. Her degrees, post and research are as published on drpoonam.info.
- Scope of service
- Mentorship, editing, biostatistics, formatting and academic-integrity review for MD, MS, DNB, DrNB, DM, MCh, MDS and international equivalents.
- Office
- SCO 02, Basement, Near PRTC Workshop, Nabha Road, Patiala, Punjab. Directions
- Support
- info@mdthesis.com
- Support hours
- 09:00 to 21:00 IST, seven days. International calls are scheduled in your own time zone.
- Response
- A senior doctor reads every feasibility enquiry and replies within one working day.
- Technology partner
- MDSoftune is developed with REDENN Informatics Inc., Canada.
- Independence
- MDThesis is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting for the NMC, NBEMS, UGC or any university.
For anything contractual — scope, revisions, refunds and the integrity position — read the terms and the refund policy. Both are written to be read rather than skipped.
Free · no account needed
Get free help with your thesis
Tell us where you are stuck. A specialist replies within one working day. Free, and no account needed.
- Reply within 1 working day
- You stay the author
- Private and safe
Your free assessment
Takes less than a minute.
Document: About the practice · Revision 1 · Last reviewed
Issued by MDThesis, a brand of REDENN Informatics Private Limited